California Quiet Title

“If we wish to be free, if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending, if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained…we must fight!” – Patrick Henry

California Quiet Title (For MERS Loans)

Quiet title actions in California have a couple of hurdles not found in other jurisdictions.  First lets discuss what exactly a quiet title action is. A quiet title action is an action to remove parasites from the land record who do not have any legal capacity to dwell on title in the record.

The advent of MERS and its use by the lenders to obfuscate who owns promissory notes and evade recording taxes provides a unique opportunity for a homeowner to use the fact that ownership is obfuscated to their own interest.
We found Walter Keane, a smart attorney in Utah doing just that. Utah is a non judicial deed of trust state like California, Virginia, New Mexico & Arizona and several others. Here’s how the attack works and why. On your deed of trust are
several named parties which are immediately changed upon the securitization of your note but these changes are not made public in the land record. Our program takes advantage of this mistake on the part of the geniuses behind MERS.

There is of course the trustee to the deed of trust. This party is typically a title company or perhaps a small law firm who performed the closing of your real estate transaction.  Then, of course there is the lender who is typically the originator of your mortgage.   Lets presume this party is Countrywide for this theoretical discussion.  Then there is MERS who is
typically named on the deed as “nominee for the beneficiary” and at times as the actual beneficiary.  Then there is you,
one of the trustors or grantors of the deed into the trust.

OK, stay with me.  As soon as your mortgage is underwritten, your underwriter in cooperation with MERS places a MIN number on your deed of trust. Promptly, your promissory note, which was probably endorsed “in blank”, passes
through a depositor to a trustee and finally into a REMIC where pass through certificates are sold to investors. OK
heres the problem… Who does the original trustee have a relationship with?    The true note holder has now
changed and the named lender on your deed is now obsolete. Making the trustee on your deed of trust now obsolete.
Well then why are they still in the land record?  Why do you as a homeowner have to suffer having a party of no interest whatsoever in your real estate or in your promissory note effecting your title?  So, get rid of them! File a suit against
these parties demanding that they remove themselves from the land record. The little title company purporting to be your trustee will probably not even answer the complaint. And VOILA!!  Laughing diabolically…guess what happens now?  
You have nullified your trust deed and insulated your home from foreclosure. Your house is now free and clear.  You owe somebody something on the promissory note…that is, unless they cannot produce the note with all of the endorsements made in accordance with the pooling and servicing agreement of the REMIC….which they probably do not have. No, you
do not have to notice the trust that purportedly owns your note of your law suit because… They are NOT IN THE PUBLIC RECORD! This method of filing quiet title in California needs to be done before the loan gets too far delinquent. The
reason is that part of the California foreclosure process is for the REMIC or MBS to file a substitution of trustee document
in the land record to change trustees to one that does have a relationship with the note holder. They cannot do this until
the loan is in serious default. This substitution of trustee corrects the very weakness that our quiet title method exploits.

Further complicating the process in California is the tender rule. If the foreclosure process is in full swing and your
action is viewed as a defense to foreclosure because the legal process was already in place, the judge may require
that you tender a bond in the amount of your principal balance to proceed with your California quiet title action. Do not
construe this article as legal advice as the author is not an attorney and is in fact pretty dumb. If you wish to discover
more about quiet title in California fill out the form and specifically request information on quiet title actions.  We do have
an attorney who files quiet title actions in California.

CALIFORNIA QUIET TITLE LAW – A GENERAL OVERVIEW

The statutory provisions for Quiet Title in California can be found in the California Code of Civil Procedure Sections
760.10-760.060
. A Quiet Title action is basically a legal action that seeks to “quiet title” to property where adverse claims are made against the property. For example, where a lender wrongfully forecloses on a property and claims the property
as their own, but the homeowner challenges this.

Here is the California Quiet Title Statutory Law (there are also cases interpreting these quiet title provisions).  Bolded
and italics material are provided by me:

760.010.  As used in this chapter:

(a) “Claim” includes a legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien, or interest in property or cloud upon title.

(b) “Property” includes real property, and to the extent applicable, personal property.

760.020.  (a) An action may be brought under this chapter to establish title against adverse claims to real or personal property or any interest therein.

(b) An action may be brought under this chapter by parties to an agreement entered into pursuant to Section 6307 or 6357 of the Public Resources Code to confirm the validity of the agreement.

(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the right of members of the public to bring or participate in actions challenging the validity of agreements entered into pursuant to Section 6307 or 6357 of the Public Resources Code.

760.030.  (a) The remedy provided in this chapter is cumulative and not exclusive of any other remedy, form or right
of action, or proceeding provided by law for establishing or quieting title to property.

(b) In an action or proceeding in which establishing or quieting title to property is in issue the court in its discretion may, upon motion of any party, require that the issue be resolved pursuant to the provisions of this chapter to the extent practicable.

760.040.  (a) The superior court has jurisdiction of actions under this chapter.

(b) The court has complete jurisdiction over the parties to the action and the property described in the complaint and
is deemed to have obtained possession and control of the property for the purposes of the action with complete jurisdiction to render the judgment provided for in this chapter.

(c) Nothing in this chapter limits any authority the court may have to grant such equitable relief as may be proper under the circumstances of the case.

760.050.  Subject to the power of the court to transfer actions, the proper county for the trial of an action under this chapter is:

(a) Where the subject of the action is real property or real and personal property, the county in which the real property,
or some part thereof, is located
.

(b) Where the subject of the action is personal property, the county in which the personal property is principally located at the commencement of the action or in which the defendants, or any of them, reside at the commencement of the action.

760.060.  The statutes and rules governing practice in civil actions generally apply to actions under this chapter except where they are inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter.

CALIFORNIA QUIET TITLE LAW SUMMARY

So, in short, the main purpose of a quiet title action is to establish title against adverse claims to real property or personal property.  As set forth above, the remedy of quiet title can be combined with other causes of action or other remedies. And, in any action or proceeding in which establishing or quieting title to property is in issue, the court may, in its discretion and on the motion of any party, require that the issue be resolved pursuant to the California Code Of Civil Procedure provisions relating to quiet title actions.

In regards to proper jurisdiction for a California quiet title lawsuit, the quiet title lawsuit must be brought in the superior court of the county where the real property is located. Once the Quiet Title Action is before the court, the court has complete power to determine title issues.

NOTE: SECTION 761.020-761.040 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SETS FORTH SPECIFIC PLEADING REQUIREMENTS AND LIS PENDES RULES WHEN FILING A QUIET TITLE LAWSUIT.  THE RULES CAN BE FOUND HERE:

761.010.  (a) An action under this chapter is commenced by filing a complaint with the court.

(b) Immediately upon commencement of the action, the plaintiff shall file a notice of the pendency (THIS IS THE “LIS PENDENS” WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THIS IN OTHER BLOG ARTICLES) of the action in the office of the county recorder of each county in which any real property described in the complaint is located.

LIS PENDENS NOTE (NOW CALLED THE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF ACTION): This lis pendens puts other parties on notice of your claim to real property and usually stops anyone from buying or selling your real property while the lawsuit is pending.  The lis pendens can later be removed, or dissolved by Court order.  Please note, there are very specific requirements for filing a lis pendens that you will need to be familiar with (google “vondran lis pendens” for more information).

761.020.  The complaint shall be verified and shall include all of the following:

(a) A description of the property that is the subject of the action. In the case of tangible personal property, the description shall include its usual location. In the case of real property, the description shall include both its legal description and its street address or common designation, if any.

(b) The title of the plaintiff as to which a determination under this chapter is sought and the basis of the title. If the title is based upon adverse possession, the complaint shall allege the specific facts constituting the adverse possession.

(c) The adverse claims to the title of the plaintiff against which a determination is sought.

(d) The date as of which the determination is sought. If the determination is sought as of a date other than the date the complaint is filed, the complaint shall include a statement of the reasons why a determination as of that date is sought.

(e) A prayer for the determination of the title of the plaintiff against the adverse claims.

REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO A CALIFORNIA QUIET TITLE LAWSUIT:

761.030.  (a) The answer shall be verified and shall set forth:

(1) Any claim the defendant has.

(2) Any facts tending to controvert such material allegations of the complaint as the defendant does not wish to be taken as true.

(3) A statement of any new matter constituting a defense.

(b) If the defendant disclaims in the answer any claim, or suffers judgment to be taken without answer, the plaintiff shall not recover costs.

761.040.  (a) The defendant may by cross-complaint seek affirmative relief in the action.

(b) If the defendant seeks a determination of title as of a date other than the date specified in the complaint, the cross-complaint shall include the date and a statement of the reasons why a determination as of that date is sought.

PARTIES IN A CALIFORNIA QUIET TITLE ACTION (PARTY ISSUES).

California Code of Civil Procedure Section 762.010-762.090 states that the when filing the Quiet Title Lawsuit, the Plaintiff must name as defendants all persons known or unknown claiming an interest in the property and other rules regarding proper parties in a quiet title action are addressed in these sections.

Here are those Sections:

762.010.  The plaintiff shall name as defendants in the action the persons having adverse claims to the title of the plaintiff against which a determination is sought.

762.020.  (a) If the name of a person required to be named as a defendant is not known to the plaintiff, the plaintiff shall so state in the complaint and shall name as parties all persons unknown in the manner provided in Section 762.060.

(b) If the claim or the share or quantity of the claim of a person required to be named as a defendant is unknown, uncertain, or contingent, the plaintiff shall so state in the complaint. If the lack of knowledge, uncertainty, or contingency is caused by a transfer to an unborn or un-ascertained person or class member, or by a transfer in the form of a contingent remainder, vested remainder subject to defeasance, executory interest, or similar disposition, the plaintiff shall also state in the complaint, so far as is known to the plaintiff, the name, age, and legal disability (if any) of the person in being who would be entitled to the claim had the contingency upon which the claim depends occurred prior to the commencement of the action.

762.030.  (a) If a person required to be named as a defendant is dead and the plaintiff knows of a personal representative, the plaintiff shall join the personal representative as a defendant.

(b) If a person required to be named as a defendant is dead, or is believed by the plaintiff to be dead, and the plaintiff knows of no personal representative:

(1) The plaintiff shall state these facts in an affidavit filed with the complaint.

(2) Where it is stated in the affidavit that such person is dead, the plaintiff may join as defendants “the testate and intestate

successors of ____ (naming the deceased person), deceased, and all persons claiming by, through, or under such decedent,” naming them in that manner.

(3) Where it is stated in the affidavit that such person is believed to be dead, the plaintiff may join the person as a defendant, and may also join “the testate and intestate successors of ____ (naming the person) believed to be deceased, and all persons claiming by, through, or under such person,” naming them in that manner.

762.040.  The court upon its own motion may, and upon motion of any party shall, make such orders as appear appropriate:

(a) For joinder of such additional parties as are necessary or proper.

(b) Requiring the plaintiff to procure a title report and designate a place where it shall be kept for inspection, use, and copying by the parties.

762.050.  Any person who has a claim to the property described in the complaint may appear in the proceeding. Whether or not the person is named as a defendant in the complaint, the person shall appear as a defendant.

762.060.  (a) In addition to the persons required to be named as defendants in the action, the plaintiff may name as defendants “all persons unknown, claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the property described in the complaint adverse to plaintiff’s title, or any cloud upon plaintiff’s title thereto,” naming them in that manner.

(b) In an action under this section, the plaintiff shall name as defendants the persons having adverse claims that are of record or known to the plaintiff or reasonably apparent from an inspection of the property.

(c) If the plaintiff admits the validity of any adverse claim, the complaint shall so state.

762.070.  A person named and served as an unknown defendant has the same rights as are provided by law in cases of all other defendants named and served, and the action shall proceed against unknown defendants in the same manner as against other defendants named and served, and with the same effect.

762.080.  The court upon its own motion may, and upon motion of any party shall, make such orders for appointment of guardians ad litem as appear necessary to protect the interest of any party.

762.090.  (a) The state may be joined as a party to an action under this chapter.

(b) This section does not constitute a change in, but is

declaratory of, existing law.

WHO BEARS THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN A CALIFORNIA QUIET TITLE ACTION?  THE ANSWER WILL USUALLY DEPEND ON WHETHER DEFENDANT HOLDS LEGAL TITLE OR WHETHER TITLE IS DISPUTED.

In a California Quiet Title lawsuit (WHERE LEGAL TITLE VESTS IN DEFENDANTS), the Plaintiff must bear the burden of proof (this is the case in most civil lawsuits).  The normal burden of proof in a civil lawsuit is “preponderance of the evidence.”  However, in a Quiet Title action, the standard of proof is higher and the Plaintiff must establish its right to title by “CLEAR AND CONVINCING” proof.  See California Evidence Code Section 662 which discusses the burden of proof in a Quiet Title case:

662.  The owner of the legal title to property is presumed to be the owner of the full beneficial title. This presumption may be rebutted only by clear and convincing proof.

IF TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY IS “DISPUTED” (AS OPPOSED TO HAVING LEGAL TITLE HELD BY A DEFENDANT) THEN THE TYPICAL “PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE” STANDARD WILL APPLY.

A JUDGEMENT IN A QUIET TITLE ACTION IS NORMALLY CONCLUSIVE ON ALL PARTIES KNOWN OR UNKNOWN WHO WERE PARTIES TO THE ACTION.

California Code of Civil Procedure Section 764.030 States:

764.030.  The judgment in the action is binding and conclusive on all of the following persons, regardless of any legal disability:

(a) All persons known and unknown who were parties to the action and who have any claim to the property, whether present or future, vested or contingent, legal or equitable, several or undivided.
  Except as provided in Section 764.045, all persons who were not parties to the action and who have any claim to the property which was not of record at the time the lis pendens was filed or, if none was filed, at the time the judgment was recorded.

HOWEVER, A QUIET TITLE ACTION WILL NOT NORMALLY AFFECT TITLE TO PARTIES WHO WERE NOT A PARTY TO THE ACTION IF THEIR CLAIM WAS KNOWN, OR REASONABLY SHOULD HAVE BEEN KNOWN.

California Code of Civil Procedure Section 764.045 states:

764.045.  Except to the extent provided in Section 1908, the judgment does not affect a claim in the property or part thereof of any person who was not a party to the action if any of the following conditions is satisfied:

(a) The claim was of record at the time the lis pendens was filed or, if none was filed, at the time the judgment was recorded.
(b) The claim was actually known to the plaintiff or would have been reasonably apparent from an inspection of the property at the time the lis pendens was filed or, if none was filed, at the time the judgment was entered. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to impair the rights of a bona fide purchaser or encumbrancer for value dealing with the plaintiff or the plaintiff’s successors in interest.

THERE ARE NO DEFAULT JUDGMENTS – EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED IN A QUIET TITLE LAWSUIT:

California Code of Civil Procedure Section 764.010 States:

764.010.  The court shall examine into and determine the plaintiff’s title against the claims of all the defendants. The court shall not enter judgment by default but shall in all cases require evidence of plaintiff’s title and hear such evidence as may be offered respecting the claims of any of the defendants, other than claims the validity of which is admitted by the plaintiff in the complaint. The court shall render judgment in accordance with the evidence and the law.

Quiet Title Case: Mangindin v. Washington Mutual Bank, 637 F. Supp.2d 700, (N.D. Cal.) 2009.

QUIET TITLE IN THE FORECLOSURE CONTEXT: TENDER ISSUES

Under California law, a plaintiff seeking to quiet title in the face of a foreclosure must allege tender or an offer of tender of the amount borrowed.  See Arnolds Management Corp v. Eischen, 158 Cal.App.3d 575, 578, 205 Cal.Rptr. 15 (1984).  This may make Quiet Title a more difficult proposition in a foreclosure case.

QUICK SUMMARY OF CALIFORNIA QUIET TITLE LAW

(1) THE COMPLAINT AND ANSWER TO A QUIET TITLE ACTION MUST BE VERIFIED (ESSENTIALLY MEANING MADE UNDER OATH) AND NAME ALL KNOWN OR UNKNOWN PARTIES CLAIMING AN INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY.

(2) THE QUIET TITLE COMPLAINT MUST DESCRIBE THE PROPERTY WITH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND COMMON ADDRESS DESCRIPTION.

(3) PLAINTIFF IN A CALIFORNIA QUIET TITLE ACTION MUST SET FORTH WHAT THE ADVERSE CLAIMS (SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC FACTS) ARE AND WHAT TYPE OF DETERMINATION IS SOUGHT.

(4) QUIET TITLE ACTION MUST SET FORTH THE DATE THE DETERMINATION IS SOUGHT AND A PRAYER FOR RELIEF TO DETERMINE PLAINTIFF’S TITLE AGAINST THE ADVERSE CLAIMS.

(5) A QUIET TITLE LAWSUIT MUST BE BROUGHT IN THE PROPER COUNTY.

(6) ANY PERSON WHO CLAIMS AN ADVERSE INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY MAY JOIN IN THE LAWSUIT EVEN IF THEY WERE NOT NAMED AS A A DEFENDANT.

(7) A QUIET TITLE LAWSUIT REQUIRES PROPER USE OF THE LIS PENDENS PROCEDURE (NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF ACTION).

(8) IN A QUIET TITLE ACTION, THE OWNER OF LEGAL TITLE (CHECK THE TITLE REPORT) IS PRESUMED TO BE THE OWNER, AND THIS CAN ONLY BE REBUTTED BY A SHOWING OF CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY.

(9) GENERALLY SPEAKING, THERE ARE NO JURY TRIALS IN A QUIET TITLE ACTION AS THESE ACTIONS ARE “EQUITABLE” IN NATURE (NOT SEEKING MONEY DAMAGES) SO THE COURT WILL DECIDE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM AND EQUITABLE DEFENSES MAY BE ASSERTED BY OPPOSING PARTIES.  THE EXCEPTION WOULD BE IF PLAINTIFF IS OUT OF POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY AND IS FILING THE QUIET TITLE ACTION TO REGAIN POSSESSION – IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES THE CLAIM MAY BE DEEMED “LEGAL” IN NATURE AND A JURY TRIAL MAY BE REQUESTED.  SEE MEDEIROS V. MEDEIROS, 177 CAL APP. 2d 69, (1960).  THE PRUDENT PRACTICE IS TO ALWAYS REQUEST A JURY TRIAL WHEN FILING A PLEADING IF THAT IS WHAT YOU WANT.  RAISE IT OR WAIVE IT IS THE GENERAL RULE.

(10) GENERALLY SPEAKING, A JUDGMENT IN A QUIET TITLE LAWSUIT IS CONCLUSIVE AND BINDING ON ALL PARTIES TO THE LITIGATION, BUT MAY NOT BE BINDING ON PARTIES NOT INVOLVED IN THE QUIET TITLE LAWSUIT BUT WHOS CLAIMS WERE KNOWN OR REASONABLY APPARENT.  THERE ARE NO DEFAULT JUDGMENTS – CLEAR EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED.

(11) IN A QUIET TITLE ACTION IN THE FORECLOSURE OF A RESIDENCE, THE COURT MAY REQUIRE THE PLAINTIFF TO “DO EQUITY” OR TENDER AMOUNTS OWED OR IN ARREARS OR PAY THE ENTIRE BALANCE.  A PARTY CANNOT USUALLY “GET EQUITY” IF THEY DON’T “DO EQUITY”.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

8 comments on “California Quiet Title

  1. This is an excellent article on Quiet Title in CA. I need a Northern CA Attorney who knows how to properly file and argue on my Quiet Title Case on a residential home foreclosure on securitized loan. Please e-mail me information on 2-3 qualified attorneys.

  2. Hello. Please send me the other information on quiet title actuions.
    I also need a Los Angeles area attorney who can either do quiet title or, since it’s in foreclosure and bankdruptcy, act in federal court.

  3. I was tricked out of my house and then accused of abandoning my home. Can you forward info on riverside county calif lawyers that specialize in quiet titles. I need to seeif I qualify for this type of action.

    Thanks for great info!

  4. I am located 60mi north of San Francisco and looking for a reasonable attorney who is up-to-date on CA foreclosure law in and quiet title action. I am facing foreclosure and need someone to provide a strategy to prevent it, and if necessary, sue the lender (Aurora Bank). I know that the banks and paid-for politicians make it more difficult in CA but not impossible. Any takers?
    Cheers,
    Jim

  5. my mortgage has passed through 4 lenders washington mutual, green point,countrywide finaley ending with Bank of America.We never recived any paper work.Only payment voucher from B of A. Now they are asking for $3700. monthly payment.My loan is for $517,000.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>